Skip to content
Residency Citizenship Compare Pricing Tools Intel About Start with a Program-Fit Report

Spain

Spain Killed Its Golden Visa. Here Is Where the Money Actually Went.

Spain ended residency-by-investment in April 2025. We trace the displaced capital to Greece, Italy, the UAE and beyond, and what the EU's posture now signals for every golden visa.

By Robert McCray, Founder, CIVITAS Published June 25, 2026 Updated June 26, 2026

Spain did not tweak its golden visa. It abolished it. On 3 April 2025, three months after Organic Law 1/2025 hit the Official State Gazette, the property route that had handed residency to non-EU buyers spending 500,000 euros or more simply stopped existing. The political framing was housing affordability, not migration policy, and that framing matters: it tells you the program was killed to win domestic votes, not to redirect capital. The capital left anyway. Here is where it went, and why most of the post-Spain marketing you will read is selling you the wrong door.

The honest first point: Spain never needed the golden visa

The uncomfortable truth that few advisors will say out loud is that the golden visa was never Spain’s best residency product. It was its most expensive one. A client who wanted to live in Spain almost always had cheaper, faster, more durable routes that did not require parking half a million euros in a flat.

Those routes are still open. The non-lucrative visa asks for roughly 28,800 euros a year in passive income for a single applicant (tied to the IPREM indicator), no investment required. The digital nomad visa, alive and well under the Startup Act, now requires about 2,850 euros a month for a single applicant after the 2026 minimum-wage uplift, and it carries a 24 percent flat tax option on Spanish-source income up to 600,000 euros for qualifying applicants. Coordinate the tax treatment with counsel before you rely on it, but the structural point stands: if the goal is a life in Spain, the golden visa’s death changes almost nothing. You were overpaying for a benefit you could get for the cost of proving income.

So the displaced demand was never really demand for Spain. It was demand for a liquid EU residency option held as insurance, with minimal physical presence, that you could acquire by writing a cheque. That is the product that needed a new home.

Where it actually went

Greece is the clearest winner, and Henley’s 2026 wealth-migration work names it directly as a beneficiary of Spain’s closure and Portugal’s real-estate exit. Greece raised its property threshold to a tiered 800,000 euros in high-demand zones (Athens, Thessaloniki, Mykonos, Santorini, larger islands) and 400,000 euros elsewhere, with a 250,000-euro commercial-to-residential conversion track. Counterintuitively, demand rose into the price increase: Greece logged about 9,289 applications in 2024, up roughly 10 percent. The 800,000-euro tier pushed buyers into the Peloponnese, secondary cities and smaller islands. Greece won not because it is cheap, but because it kept a real-estate route at all, which is the thing the Spain refugee specifically wanted.

Italy absorbed the higher-end, tax-led money. Its investor visa runs from 250,000 euros (innovative startup) to 500,000 euros (Italian company), but the real magnet is the flat-tax regime, which rose to 300,000 euros per year on all foreign income under the 2026 Budget Law, plus 50,000 euros per family member. That is a tax product wearing a visa, and it self-selects for ultra-high-net-worth families for whom 300,000 euros a year is rounding. Italy’s appeal is structural and durable in a way a property certificate never was.

The UAE took the wealth that wanted out of Europe entirely. It has led global millionaire migration for two consecutive years, and in February 2026 it loosened the property route by dropping the 50 percent down-payment rule, so financed purchases at AED 2,000,000 (about 545,000 dollars) now qualify. Zero income tax, no genuine-link anxiety, and no looming Brussels review. For a meaningful slice of former Spain buyers, the EU itself was the feature they stopped valuing.

The Caribbean caught the passport-minded. Dominica at 200,000 dollars, Antigua at 230,000, St Kitts at 250,000 deliver citizenship in months, not years. This is a different product (citizenship, travel, true plan-B) and only partially overlaps with the Spain cohort, but the overlap is real for clients who realized that EU residency without a path to a passport was worth less than they thought.

DestinationHeadline entryWhat it actually sells
Greece250k / 400k / 800k propertyThe last credible EU real-estate route
Italy250k-500k visa; 300k/yr flat taxA tax regime for UHNW families
Portugal500k fundFund access, now with a worse citizenship clock
UAE~545k property (or talent)Tax-free exit from the EU question
Caribbean200k-250kFast citizenship and a real plan-B

The trap door: Portugal

Portugal is where the lazy advice sends everyone, and it is where we tell clients to slow down. The fund route at 500,000 euros is genuinely strong and the real-estate noise is behind it. But on 3 May 2026 the President promulgated a revised Nationality Law extending naturalization from five years to ten for most nationals (seven for EU and CPLP citizens). Stack that on AIMA’s documented 12-to-24-month processing backlog and the citizenship timeline that sold the program now stretches toward nine to thirteen years. If your client is buying Portugal for the passport, the product they were sold in 2024 no longer exists. Buy the fund for the residency and the diversification. Do not buy it for a five-year citizenship that is gone.

What the EU’s posture actually signals

The signal is the part most pieces miss. On 29 April 2025, one day before Spain’s closure took practical effect, the European Court of Justice struck down Malta’s citizenship-by-investment scheme as the commodification of EU citizenship, incompatible with the Treaties. Read the two events together. Selling EU citizenship is now effectively dead law. Selling EU residency survives, but it survives on borrowed political goodwill, and the Commission has made clear it is watching.

Our read: golden visas are not being banned in a single stroke. They are being deprecated nationality by nationality, on local pretexts (housing in Spain, naturalization integrity in Portugal, price in Greece), while the central institutions remove the citizenship endgame. The rational planning conclusion is to stop treating any EU residency-by-investment route as a citizenship pipeline and start treating it as what it is: a residency and optionality asset that may not have a back end. Clients who want a passport should look outside the EU’s reach (Caribbean, and select non-EU European options) and treat EU residency as a separate, complementary holding. Anyone selling you a 500,000-euro EU fund as a five-year route to an EU passport in 2026 is selling you yesterday’s brochure.

Written by

Robert McCray

Founder, CIVITAS

Robert McCray is the founder of CIVITAS, an independent investment-migration advisory that is paid by its clients rather than by the programs it analyses. He works across more than twenty residence and citizenship-by-investment programs and built the firm's open dataset and scoring tools to make the category legible.