Skip to content
Residency Citizenship Compare Pricing Tools Intel About Start with a Program-Fit Report

news analysis (Intel)

The Trump Gold Card, One Year In: Why Only One $1M Visa Has Been Approved

By mid-2026 the Trump Gold Card has 338 applicants, 165 paid fees, and exactly one approval, even after the price fell from $5M to $1M. CIVITAS on how the program actually works, why uptake collapsed, and whether the $5M Platinum Card will ever launch.

By Robert McCray, Founder, CIVITAS Published June 25, 2026 Updated June 26, 2026

The most expensive immigration product the United States has ever marketed has, after roughly a year, produced one approved applicant. As of late April 2026, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told Congress that exactly one person had been granted a Trump Gold Card. By May, the Department of Homeland Security counted 338 applicants and 165 who had actually paid the $15,000 processing fee. The waitlist, by contrast, sits near 70,000 names. That gap between curiosity and commitment is the entire story.

Our read at CIVITAS is blunt: the Gold Card is not a failed program so much as an unfinished one, sold as if it were finished. It works mechanically. It does not work commercially, because the one feature that would justify a seven-figure price, a tax exemption on foreign income, does not exist and cannot exist without an act of Congress. Below is how the program actually operates in mid-2026, why almost no one is buying, how it stacks against the EB-5 visa it was meant to replace, and our honest verdict on the rumored $5 million Platinum Card.

What the Gold Card actually is in 2026

Strip away the branding and the Gold Card is a fee-and-donation overlay on two existing employment-based green card categories: the EB-1 and the EB-2 National Interest Waiver. It was created by Executive Order 14351, signed September 19, 2025, after Trump first floated the idea in February 2025. Applications opened December 10, 2025 through a dedicated portal, trumpcard.gov, with adjudication running on USCIS Form I-140G.

The structure is deliberately simple, which is part of its appeal and part of its problem:

  • A nonrefundable $15,000 DHS processing fee to enter the queue.
  • A $1 million “gift” to the United States for an individual applicant, payable after vetting clears.
  • A $2 million gift for a corporate sponsor placing an employee.
  • In exchange, qualification under the EB-1 or EB-2 NIW pathway to lawful permanent residence.

Note the word “gift.” This is not an investment. Under EB-5, your capital is deployed into a project and can, in principle, be returned. Under the Gold Card, the money is gone. You are buying expedited access to a green card category you might have qualified for anyway, at a price that has no recovery mechanism. That single design choice reframes everything: the Gold Card competes not with other investment visas but with the cost of simply hiring an excellent immigration lawyer to file a conventional EB-1A.

The price already collapsed once, and it barely helped

When Trump first pitched the concept in early 2025, the number was $5 million. By the time the executive order landed in September, the structure had been quietly rebuilt around the EB-1/EB-2 framework and the individual price had been cut to $1 million, with the $2 million corporate tier. That is an 80 percent markdown before the program even opened for business.

A five-fold price cut that still yields one approval in a year is not a pricing problem. It is a product problem. The market told the administration that $5 million was unserious, the administration listened, and demand at $1 million is still effectively zero in conversion terms. When a luxury good gets cheaper and still does not sell, the issue is the value proposition, not the sticker.

Why uptake is near zero: the four real reasons

We see four compounding reasons sophisticated applicants are sitting on the waitlist rather than wiring funds.

1. The tax benefit that would justify the price does not exist. The original sales pitch implied Gold Card holders would escape U.S. tax on their worldwide income. They will not. A Gold Card holder is a U.S. tax resident, taxed on global income exactly like any other green card holder. The proposed carve-out, taxing only U.S.-source income, requires statutory change that has not happened. For a high-net-worth individual with substantial offshore income, becoming a U.S. tax resident is frequently a multi-million-dollar annual decision. Paying $1 million for the privilege of triggering it is, for many, negative value.

2. The “gift” may be a taxable event in itself. Gifting $1 million to $2 million to the federal government sits in genuinely unsettled territory regarding gift tax and reporting. The administration has not clarified the treatment. Advisors do not like writing seven-figure checks into legal ambiguity, and neither do their clients.

3. EB-1A still exists and is cheaper. If you genuinely qualify for the EB-1 extraordinary-ability category, you can pursue it through normal channels for the cost of legal fees, no $1 million gift required. The Gold Card primarily compresses timing. For applicants who already meet the bar, it is an expensive convenience.

4. Legal overhang. The program faces a federal challenge, American Association of University Professors v. Department of Homeland Security, arguing it exceeds executive authority. A government motion to dismiss is pending before Judge Richard J. Leon as of mid-2026. No serious applicant wants to gift $1 million into a program a court might unwind.

The one approval reportedly went to a celebrity who received the card at no cost. That is a marketing placement, not a market.

Gold Card vs EB-5: the comparison that matters

For an investor weighing a U.S. residency play right now, the live decision is rarely “Gold Card or nothing.” It is “Gold Card or EB-5.” Here is how they actually compare in mid-2026.

FeatureTrump Gold CardEB-5 Investor Visa
Capital required$1M gift (individual), $2M (corporate)$800K (Targeted Employment Area), $1.05M elsewhere
Is capital recoverable?No, it is a giftYes, in principle, after the conditional period
Job creation requiredNone10 full-time U.S. jobs per investor
Plus fees$15,000 processing feeFiling fees, regional center costs
Legal basisExecutive Order 14351 (EB-1/EB-2 overlay)Statute (RIA 2022)
Tax treatmentU.S. tax resident on worldwide incomeU.S. tax resident on worldwide income
Approvals to date1 (as of April 2026)Thousands annually, established track record
Key deadlineOpen-ended, legally contestedSept 30, 2026 grandfathering cutoff

The headline most outlets miss: EB-5 is cheaper, your money can come back, and it rests on statute rather than a contested executive order. The Gold Card’s only structural edge is speed and the absence of a job-creation requirement. For an applicant who cannot or will not manage a job-creating project, that simplicity has real value. For nearly everyone else, EB-5 is the more defensible instrument.

There is a clock on this. The EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act grandfathering provision sunsets September 30, 2026. Regional center petitions filed on or before that date receive statutory protection against a future program lapse. File on October 1, 2026, and you forfeit that protection. The Regional Center Program itself is currently authorized through September 30, 2027, but the grandfathering filing cutoff lands a full year earlier. Anyone seriously considering EB-5 has a hard, near-term deadline that the Gold Card’s existence does nothing to change.

The Platinum Card: a proposal, not a product

The rumored $5 million Platinum Card is the version that would actually deliver the tax benefit the Gold Card cannot: reportedly up to 270 days per year in the U.S. without triggering U.S. tax on non-U.S. income. That is a genuinely attractive proposition for a globally mobile family.

It also does not exist, and here is the part the breathless coverage skips: it cannot exist by executive order. The Platinum Card was not in Executive Order 14351. There is no application. Critically, a tax exemption on foreign income held by a U.S. resident is a change to the Internal Revenue Code, and the Internal Revenue Code is written by Congress, not the executive branch. Officials have conceded as much. Until Congress passes legislation creating this status and its tax treatment, the Platinum Card is a waitlist signup form attached to a press release.

Our view: do not plan around the Platinum Card. A program requiring fresh tax legislation in a narrowly divided Congress is, at best, a multi-year proposition with no guarantee of arrival. Treat any “join the Platinum waitlist” pitch as lead generation, not a residency strategy.

The CIVITAS verdict

One approval in a year, after an 80 percent price cut, is a clear market signal. The Gold Card was announced as a tax-advantaged golden ticket and shipped as an expensive expedite button on green cards that already exist, with a non-recoverable seven-figure gift attached and a lawsuit hanging over it. The marquee benefit is contingent on legislation that has not been written.

That does not make it useless. For a specific, narrow profile, a corporate sponsor that wants to place a key executive fast and values simplicity over capital recovery, the corporate Gold Card can pencil out. For an individual who plainly qualifies for EB-1A, it is mostly paying for speed. For almost everyone else weighing a U.S. move on the merits, EB-5 remains the more rational instrument in 2026, and the September 30 grandfathering deadline makes the timing question urgent rather than theoretical.

The deeper lesson is one we repeat with clients constantly: in residency and citizenship planning, the tax consequence usually dwarfs the application fee. A program that turns you into a U.S. worldwide-income taxpayer is a decision to be modeled in detail before a single dollar moves, not a card to be collected. The Gold Card’s near-zero uptake is the market reaching that conclusion in real time.


Where CIVITAS comes in. We are a fee-only advisory. We do not earn commissions from any government program, regional center, or developer, which is precisely why we can tell you that the most-hyped visa of 2026 has approved one person. If you are weighing a U.S. residency move, Gold Card, EB-5, or a conventional EB-1, we will model the tax exposure and the legal risk before you commit capital, and tell you plainly when the answer is to wait or to walk away. Book a confidential consultation with our U.S. team.

Common questions

How many people have been approved for the Trump Gold Card as of 2026?

As of late April 2026, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told Congress that exactly one person had been approved. By May 2026, DHS reported 338 total applicants and 165 who had paid the $15,000 processing fee, against a waitlist of roughly 70,000 names. The gap between waitlist interest and paid commitment is the clearest measure of the program’s near-zero real uptake.

How much does the Trump Gold Card cost in 2026?

There is a nonrefundable $15,000 DHS processing fee to enter the queue, plus a $1 million ‘gift’ to the United States for an individual applicant, payable after vetting clears. A corporate sponsor placing an employee pays $2 million. The price was originally pitched at $5 million in early 2025 before being cut to $1 million when the program was restructured around the EB-1 and EB-2 categories.

Does the Gold Card exempt holders from U.S. tax on foreign income?

No. A Gold Card holder is a U.S. tax resident taxed on worldwide income, exactly like any other green card holder. The proposed carve-out that would tax only U.S.-source income requires a change to the Internal Revenue Code, which Congress has not passed. This missing tax benefit is the single biggest reason sophisticated applicants are staying on the waitlist rather than paying.

What is the difference between the Gold Card and the EB-5 visa?

The Gold Card requires a $1M to $2M non-recoverable gift with no job creation, and rests on an executive order. EB-5 requires an $800K (Targeted Employment Area) or $1.05M investment that can in principle be recovered, demands creation of 10 full-time U.S. jobs, and rests on statute. Both make the holder a U.S. worldwide-income taxpayer. EB-5 is cheaper and more legally established; the Gold Card’s only edge is speed and simplicity.

Is the $5 million Platinum Card available yet?

No. As of mid-2026 the Platinum Card is a proposal only. It was not part of Executive Order 14351, there is no application, and its central feature, a tax exemption on non-U.S. income for up to 270 days per year of U.S. presence, would require new legislation from Congress. The executive branch cannot create that tax treatment on its own, so any ‘Platinum waitlist’ is lead generation, not a live program.

Is there a deadline that affects whether I should choose EB-5 over the Gold Card?

Yes. The EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act grandfathering provision sunsets on September 30, 2026. Regional center petitions filed on or before that date receive statutory protection against a future program lapse; petitions filed afterward do not. The Regional Center Program is currently authorized through September 30, 2027, but the grandfathering filing cutoff lands a year earlier, creating real urgency for anyone seriously considering the EB-5 route.

Are there legal challenges to the Trump Gold Card?

Yes. The program faces a federal lawsuit, American Association of University Professors v. Department of Homeland Security, arguing it exceeds executive authority. A government motion to dismiss was pending before Judge Richard J. Leon as of mid-2026. This unresolved legal risk is one reason applicants are reluctant to gift a seven-figure sum into a program a court could potentially unwind.

Written by

Robert McCray

Founder, CIVITAS

Robert McCray is the founder of CIVITAS, an independent investment-migration advisory that is paid by its clients rather than by the programs it analyses. He works across more than twenty residence and citizenship-by-investment programs and built the firm's open dataset and scoring tools to make the category legible.